erests of the subject of the disclosure, citing 5 U.S.C. §552a(b)(ll), Perry v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 734 F.2d 1441, 1447 (11th Cir. 1984) and Tootle v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 468 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). 17. Perry and Tootle illustrate why the Court should deny Jane Doe's Moti

rity Administration's testimony. State Farm conld have utilized normal discovery procedures to obtain the information .... " Id. at 1447. 19. In Tootle, the plaintiff sought to prevent the Social Security Administration psychologist who examined him in a disability case from giving a deposition in h