egrity of the judicial process from perversion. and abuse." Vilakis-Valchine y. Va/chine, 793 So.2d 1094, 1099-1100 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Attwood v. ,Singletary, 66i So.2d 1216 (FJa.. 1995) (invoking court's inherent authority to prevent interference with orderly process of judicial administration); Tramel

ese documents. To the contrary, "a convicted prisoner does not forfeit all constitutional protections by reason of the conviction and confinement." Singletary v. Costello, 665 So. 2d 1099, 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). For example, a convicted prisoner retains the fundamental right to privacy, espoused under