special circumstances that went beyond the six exceptions listed in Rule 6. Similarly, in In re Hastings, 735 F.2d 1261, 1268–69 (11th Cir. 1984), the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s disclosure of grand jury proceedings even though not specifically authorized by Rule 6. And the U.S. Supreme

al debt was incurred. See In re Ramsurat, 361 B.R. at 254; In re Dealers Agency Services, Inc., 380 B.R. 608, 613 (M.D. Fla. 2007) (recognizing that the Eleventh Circuit adopted the "badges of fraud" to determine fraudulent intent); Fla. Stat. §726.105(2). Moreover, Fla. Stat. §726.106, which applies to credi