Is Yorlc in the Epstein files?

"Yorlc" is not actually in the Epstein files as a real entity. It's an OCR (optical character recognition) error that occurred when scanning phone records. The software misread "New York" as "Now Yorlc" or similar variations due to poor image quality or unclear text in the original documents.

Yorlc is not a real place or organization. It's a data artifact created when document scanning software incorrectly read "New York, NY" in phone call records. All 9 mentions are from three phone record documents (EFTA00007301, EFTA00007401, EFTA00007501) dated between 2004-2005.

Why does Yorlc appear as a location in the database?

The entity extraction system automatically identified text patterns in the documents and classified "Now Yorlc. NY" as a location because it appeared in the same format as legitimate city names (with a state abbreviation). This demonstrates how OCR errors in source documents can propagate through automated processing pipelines, creating spurious entities that need manual review and cleanup.

Is Yorlc in the Epstein files?

"Yorlc" is not actually in the Epstein files as a real entity. It's an OCR (optical character recognition) error that occurred when scanning phone records. The software misread "New York" as "Now Yorlc" or similar variations due to poor image quality or unclear text in the original documents.

Yorlc is not a real place or organization. It's a data artifact created when document scanning software incorrectly read "New York, NY" in phone call records. All 9 mentions are from three phone record documents (EFTA00007301, EFTA00007401, EFTA00007501) dated between 2004-2005.

Why does Yorlc appear as a location in the database?

The entity extraction system automatically identified text patterns in the documents and classified "Now Yorlc. NY" as a location because it appeared in the same format as legitimate city names (with a state abbreviation). This demonstrates how OCR errors in source documents can propagate through automated processing pipelines, creating spurious entities that need manual review and cleanup.

Back to People & Entities

Yorlc

Location

Total Mentions

Documents

113

Connected Entities

Location referenced in documents

"Yorlc" is not a real location—it's an OCR error from phone records where "New York" was misread as "Now Yorlc" due to poor scan quality. All 9 mentions appear in phone call logs from 2004-2005.

This entity appears exclusively in phone records (documents EFTA00007301, EFTA00007401, and EFTA00007501) as a garbled location name. The OCR software misinterpreted "New York, NY" in multiple entries, creating variations like "Now Yorlc. NY" and "Now York NY." These are call records showing outgoing calls to New York numbers, with the entity extraction incorrectly treating the OCR errors as a separate location. The records span from May 2004 through December 2005 and document phone activity between New York, Miami FL, and other locations.

Key Highlights

•All mentions are OCR errors from the same phrase: "New York, NY" misread as "Now Yorlc. NY"
•Appears only in phone call logs showing times, directions (incoming/outgoing), and call durations
•The genuine location being referenced is New York City, not a place called "Yorlc"
•This represents a data quality issue where imperfect document scanning created phantom entities in the extraction process

Frequently Asked Questions

Document Mentions (8)

EFTA00007301 - EFTA00007400

Source: DOJ EFTA Records

5 mentions

1/04 Miami. FL 12:41 PM ext 1 Outgoing 5/11/04 incoming 12:42 PM ext 1 Incoming 5/11/04 New York NY 4:13 PM ext 1 Outgoing 5/11/04 Now Yorlc. NY 526 PM ext 1 Outgoing 5/11/04 New York NY &40 PM ext 1 Outgoing 5/11/04 Miami, FL 8:36 PM ext 1 Outgoing 5/12/04 Incoming 7:25 AP

Page: EFTA00007369 →

EFTA00007401 - EFTA00007500

Source: DOJ EFTA Records

5 mentions

(F) 1 S $ 9/10/04 New York. NY 10:49 PM (F) 2 $ 9/10/04 New York. NY 11:44 PM (F) 2 9/11/04 New York. NY 12:10 AM (F) 2 9/11/04 Now Yorlc. NY 12:11 AM (F) 1 9/11/04 incoming 12:18AM (F) 9/11/04 New Y0rk. NY 1:51 AM $ $ 9/11/04 Miami, Ft. 11:41 AM 1 • 9/11/04 Miami. FL 11

Page: EFTA00007404 →

EFTA00007501 - EFTA00007542

Source: DOJ EFTA Records

5 mentions

ll Charges Charges Total 1210205 Incoming 4:58 PM 3 - 12/02/05 Incoming 5:51 PM • 3 S. 12/02/05 Now York NY 7:51 PM • $ 12/02/05 Now Yorlc. NY .751 PM 2 S $ $ 12/02/05 Milt16, FL 756 PM 38 • 3 12/02/05 Miami. FL 834 PM 8 $ $ 12/03/05 Incoming 7:02 AM $ - $ 3 12103/0

Page: EFTA00007537 →

Sponsored

EFTA01695290.pdf

EFTA01695290

1 mention

NYC, NY 4:41 PM 1 5 7/19106 New York, NY 4:50 PM 1 S - $ • 7/19/06 Incoming 4:51 PSI 3 $ 7/19106 Incoming 5:12 PM • $ 7/19/06 Now Yorlc, NY 5:29 Phl tF) • $ 7/19706 New York, NY 8:39 PM 2 $ 7/19105 Incoming 7:24 PM (F) • $ 7/19/05 New York, NY " 1 Pa n 1 - S 7/19/06

EFTA01714184.pdf

EFTA01714184

1 mention

11/04/05 New York. NY 3:42 AM 1 3 - $ 11/04/05 Now York NY 3:43 AAA 1 $ - $ • $ 11/04/05 Now York, NY 3:43 AM 2 $ - $ 11/04/05 Now Yorlc, NY 3:54 AM 1 S - $ 11/04/05 New Yorks NY 9:22 AM 3 - $ 11/04/05 New York, NY 10:05 AM - $ 11/04/05 New York, NY 11:37 AM 2 - $ S

EFTA01719436.pdf

EFTA01719436

1 mention

ing 9:40 AM 2 • $ 9/17/04 !morning 9:44 AM 1 • S 9/17/04 Incoming 9.51 AM 2 • $ 9/17/04 Miami, FL 11:29 AM (F) 5 • $ 9/17/04 Now Yorlc, NY 11:33 AM 2 - S 9/17/04 Incoming 12:Ci2 PM 1 • $ 9/17/04 Incoming 12:03 PM 3 • $ 9/17/04 Incoming 12:17 PM • $ 9/17/04 Incoming

Sponsored

EFTA01719536.pdf

EFTA01719536

1 mention

rges Charges Total 12102'05 Incoming 4:58 PM 3 - $ 12/02/05 Incoming 5:51 PM 1 • 3 S. 12/02/05 Now York NY 7:51 PM • $ 12/02/05 Now Yorlc. NY .751 PM 2 S $ $ 12/02/05 Miami, Ft. 756 PM 38 • 3 12/02/05 Miami. FL 834 PM 8 $ $ $ 12/03/05 Incoming 7:02 AM - $ 3 12103/0

EFTA01725852.pdf

EFTA01725852

1 mention

$ 6/26/06 White PIS, NY 7:25 PM (F) 1 $ 6/26/06 white Pls, NY 725 PM (P) 1 - $ 6/26/06 Bronx Nye, NY 726 PM (F) 2 - $ 6/26/06 NOW Yorlc, NY 728 PM (F) 1 - $ 6/26/06 White Pts, NY 7:29 PM 1 - $ 6/26/06 New York, NY 7:30 PM (F) 1 - $ 6/26/06 Bronx Nyc, NY 7:31 PM (F)

Sponsored