m 1937 to 2002. [c] In a letter to the Wall Street Journal. Reprinted with permission; emphasis added. [d] This may not have been a permanent change. The National Taxpayers Union rated the Blue Dog Democrats as having a fiscal conservatism score of 52% in 1995; by 2009, it had fallen to 18%. [e] Would McGovern's focus on red t

from 1937 to 2002. ' In a letter to the Wall Street Journal. Reprinted with permission; emphasis added. * This may not have been a permanent change. The National Taxpayers Union rated the Blue Dog Democrats as having a fiscal conservatism score of 52% in 1995; by 2009, it had fallen to 18%. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030010 --- PAGE BR

m 1937 to 2002. [c] In a letter to the Wall Street Journal. Reprinted with permission; emphasis added. [d] This may not have been a permanent change. The National Taxpayers Union rated the Blue Dog Democrats as having a fiscal conservatism score of 52% in 1995; by 2009, it had fallen to 18%. [e] Would McGovern's focus on red t

1937 to 2002. [c] In a letter to the Wall Street Journal. Reprinted with permission; emphasis added. [d] This may not have been a permanent change. The National Taxpayers Union rated the Blue Dog Democrats as having a fiscal conservatism score of 52% in 1995; by 2009, it had fallen to 18%. [e] Would McGovem's focus on red