ds, 569 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2008) ........ Rivera v. Heyman, 157 F.3d 101 (2d Cir, 1998) eee Salahi v. Obama, 625 F.3d 745 (D.C. Cit, 2010) veces Samantar v. Yousuf, et al., 130 S. Ct. 2278 (2010) eee *vili Schneberger v. Wheeler, 859 F.2d 1477 (11th Cir. L988), sarcasm cena enemies Sickles v. Montgom

d not make a rec- ommendation, courts decided for themselves whether to grant immunity, although they did so by reference to State Department policy. Samantar v. Yousuf, 560 U.S. 305, 311-312 (2010). Until 1952, the State Department adhered to the classi- cal theory of foreign sovereign immunity. According

en Indyke Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 4:04 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Darren Indyke Subject: Privileged and Confidential Attachments: Samantar v Yousuf.rtf; Untitled attachment 00924.htm EFTA_R1_01860524 EFTA02635079

ntial Attachments: In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11 2001-5.0 Untitled attachment 00685.htm Terrorist III. This case was abrogated by SCT in Samantar v.Yousef, which I will send next. 1 EFTA_R1_01860607 EFTA02635118