April 2017 he stipulated to dismissal of his appeal without prejudice. In July 2017 he moved to reinstate his appeal and to consolidate it with Mr. Cernovich's appeal. Merits briefing concluded by early 2018. Supplemental briefing was concluded by April 2018. Discussion None of the appellants is entitle

the protections afforded the parties and non-parties under this Court's right-to-access jurisprudence. The appellants Miami Herald, Dershowitz and Cernovich —and the Court in its Order to Show Cause—rested heavily on Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). With respect, neither

ed the law because he and other prosecutors deliberately kept the deal secret from Epstein’s vic- tims, who are now in their late 20s and early 30s. Cernovich’s lawyer, Marc J. Randazza, said he has never seen a court seal nearly an entire court record like this. “T've seen partial seals, but I’ve never se

Granting Dershowitz Motion to Intervene); v. Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS), 2017 WL 1787934 (S.D.N.Y. May 3, 2017), ECF No. 892 (Opinion Granting Cernovich Motion to Intervene). 121 PIAlthough the case was closed by the Clerk of Court on May 25, 2017 pursuant to the settlement agreement, "intervention

stein victim has said that right-wing personality Michael Cemovich's request to compel her to pay costs in a Second Circuit appeal is an attempt by Cernovich and Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz to intimidate her, prompting Cernovich to apologize and distance himself from the professor. &lot

moved to intervene, seeking to unseal three do l. that, he argues, demonstrate that invented the accusations against him. On January 19, 2017, Cernovich, an independent blogger and self-described "popular political journalist,"7 moved to intervene, seeking to unseal the summary judgment record, a

d, and Dershowitz joined his motion. On April 6, 2018, after the case had settled, the Herald moved to intervene and unseal , an' 7 Br. Appellant (Cernovich) 4. 8 EFTA00092315 the entire docket. The District Court granted each of these motions to intervene, but denied the related requests to unseal i