nd determined in that action.” AMEC Civil, LLC v. State Dept. of Transp., ___S0.2d__, 2010 WL 1542634 at *2 (Fl

F.3d 1361, 1364-75 (11th Cir. 1998) oo ccceeeeeseteeteesetseteeteesenes 3 Seligson, Morris & Neuburger v Fairbanks Whitney Corp., 257 N.Y.S.2d 706 (1st Dept. 1965)35 Sidor v. Reno, 95 CIV. 9588 (KMW), 1998 WL 164823, *2 (S.D.N.Y. April 7, 1998)... 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984)

esentation claims that would effectively allow private rights of action under the Martin Act were pre-empted. Horn v. 440 ES7th Co., 151 A.D.2d 112 (1st Dept. 1989); Stephenson v. Citco Group Limited; Citco Fund Services (Europe) BV, 700 F.Supp.2d 599 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); Barron v. lgolnick, 2010 WL 882890 (S.D