nullity, contrary to "the well-established rule of statutory construction that [courts] must give effect to every word of a statute when possible." Accardo v. U.S. Attorney General, 634 F.3d 1333, 1337 (11th Cir. 2011). The victims have made this point repeatedly in their pleadings. The Government respo

he presence or absence of a functioning tumor (Hartman et al, 1994, Mandell and Selz, 1997a); automated differentiation of ataxic from normal speech (Accardo and Menulo, 1998); and discrimination of temporomandibular joint dysfunction from normal patterns of chewing motions (Morinushi et al, 1998). Styles