in answering this question, commentators point to Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinions answering in the contrary. To what

OLC Dixon Memo. This memo, signed by the head of the Office of Legal Counsel, Robert Dixon, is a procedural anomaly: It was no

ram Providing Matching Funds Contributions to Non-Profit Organization Department of Justice House Judiciary Committee Office of Government Ethics Office of Legal Counsel Office of Professional Responsiblity Senate Judiciary Committee Copyright © 2011 WDC Media LLC http://www. mainjustice.com/2011/03/22/attorneys-sa

ouncil on International Policy; Center for American Progress. David Barron — Professor, Harvard Law School. Fmr Acting Asst U.S. Attorney General in the Office of Legal Counsel. Kirsten Bartok -- CEO, AirFinance. Fmr CFO of XOJet. Fmr GP at Alpine Investors. Evan Bayh -— Sr Advisor, Apollo Management. Partner, McGuireWoods.

deral cases. In 2010, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) weighed in on the issue and released a lega

t it’s this sort of self-justifying loop in which professionals are loaning their credentials to this kind of activity. And you see the same thing in the Office of Legal Counsel, where you have, you know, lawyers loaning their credentials to approving what are clear violations of the Geneva Conventions." (https:/Awww.democrac

t it’s this sort of self-justifying loop in which professionals are loaning their credentials to this kind of activity. And you see the same thing in the Office of Legal Counsel, where you have, you know, lawyers loaning their credentials to approving what are clear violations of the Geneva Conventions." (https:/Awww.democrac

t it’s this sort of self-justifying loop in which professionals are loaning their credentials to this kind of activity. And you see the same thing in the Office of Legal Counsel, where you have, you know, lawyers loaning their credentials to approving what are clear violations of the Geneva Conventions." (https://www.democra

ever be filed. The issue of pre-charging rights has most prominently surfaced in connection with federal cases. In 2010, the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) weighed in on the issue and released a legal opinion arguing that victims of federal crimes have no CVRA rights during a federal criminal inves

ITE 1000 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02116 EMAIL ADDRESSES: FAX NIGHT EMERGENCY: April 24, 2015 Via Email and U.S. Mail John Zucker Assistant Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel 77 W 66TH St, Room 1628 New York, NY 10023 Re: Good Morning America and Night Line interview with Jane Doe 3 Dear Mr. Zucker: I represent Jeffrey Eps

TE 1000 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02116 EMAIL ADDRESSES: FAX. NIGHT EMERGENCY: April 24, 2015 Via Email and U.S. Mail John Zucker Assistant Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel 77 W 66TH St, Room 1628 New York, NY 10023 Re: Good Morning America and Night Line interview with Jane Doe 3 Dear Mr. Zucker: I represent Jeffrey Eps

the indictment. The Department of Justice's standing view precludes charging a sitting president with a crime. This is based on an opinion written by the Office of Legal Counsel in the Watergate era and recently expressed in hyperbolic terms by Giuliani: the President could kill James Comey if he wanted to without fear of pro

60) (asserting that the President need not enforce a statute purporting to appoint an officer); see also annotations of attached Attorney General and Office of Legal Counsel opinions. Moreover, as we discuss more fully below, numerous Presidents have provided advance notice of their intention not to enforce specific statu

indictment. But the Department of Justice's standing view precludes charging a sitting president with a crime. This is based on an opinion written by the Office of Legal Counsel in the Watergate era and recently expressed in hyperbolic terms by Giuliani: the President could kill James Comey if he wanted to without fear of pro