to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them.” Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); Accord, Vasquez v. State, 777 So. 2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. at 2001). The reason for this rule “is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the

ed" by the possibility of "allow[ing] wealthy defendants to buy their way out by constructing a private jail." (internal quotation marks omitted)). Accord, e.g., United States v. Cilins, No. 13 Cr. 315 EFTA00030253 --- PAGE BREAK --- Honorable Richard M. Berman United States District Judge July 12