at 9:56 AM, George Church > wrote: Yes. I'm working toward this goal fairly rapidly, but trying to do so in a way that minimizes risk to the field. James Wilson (who happened to be my physician, in the 1990s) set back the field of gene therapy by a decade by rushing. http://www.scientificamerican.com/articl

1/18/2011 2:56:16 PM Subject: RE: Yes. I'm working toward this goal fairly rapidly, but trying to do so in a way that minimizes risk to the field. James Wilson (who happened to be my physician, in the 1990s) set back the field of gene therapy by a decade by rushing. http:llwww.scientificamerican.com/articl

9:56 AM, George Church > > wrote: Yes. l'= working toward this goal fairly rapidly, but trying to do so in a way tha= minimizes risk to the field. James Wilson (who happened to be my physicia=, in the 1990s) set back the field of gene therapy by a decade by rushing.=u> http://www.scientifi=american.com/art

2011 at 9:56 AM, George Church =1 Yes. I'm working toward this goal fairly rapidly, but =rying to do so in a way that minimizes risk to the field. James Wilson (wh= happened to be my physician, in the 1990s) set back the field of gene the=apy by a decade by rushing. http://www.scientifi=american.com/articl

sideration, but we will not, under our reading of the Constitution, consider it legally binding." Id. at 1149. Historical Materials 1) Statement of James Wilson on December 1, 1787 on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, reprinted in 2 Jonathan Elliot, Debates on the Federal Constitution 418 (1836): Wils