From: Chris Dilorio e > Sent: Tuesda Ma 12 2020 8:54 AM To Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Almost immediately I filed a formal appeal to the SEC OWB fabricated denial of my award application. In this appeal I show irrefutable proof of my allegations: The SEC OWB used/ is using my information to both bring complaints AND obstruct complaints while denying me compensation. In short: My information exposes an ongoing, massive in scope, SEC facilitated fraud on the American people. Rather than shut it down, the SEC has chosen to cover up so that the illegal activity can continue. It does in 2020 Chris From: Chris Dilorio e > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 7:16 PM Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix From: Chris Dilorio Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix The SMOKING GUN in my allegations: Naked shorting in CGFIA (My TCR/FINRA complaint) by "un named third party BD" in 2013. Well known to the SEC. This is why there was no investigation into the ENTIRETY of the FINRA trading activity. The SEC issued waivers to Opco within days of its AML complaint. WHO was the SEC protecting? WHO were the customers and executing BD's/MM's in the Opco complaint? ALSO well known to the SEC: MY INFORMATION. 5 years to get a preliminary denial: statute of limitations. BUT the last overt act of this ongoing conspiracy has not yet occurred. Chris From: Chris Dilorio e > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 7:56 AM Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Still more evidence of a well orchestrated scheme to cover up and obstruct a FULL SEC investigation into Opco/Gibraltar/NITE/UBSS trading activity in billions of shares of OTCM money laundering shells. The SEC used EFTA00069297

my information to bring AND obstruct complaints. The 2 SEC Commissioners dissent in granting Oppenheimer waivers after this egregious activity https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/dissenting-statement-oppenheimer-inc.html SEC.gov I Dissenting Statement In the Matter of Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. Dissenting Statement In the Matter of Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., by Commissioner Luis A. Aguilar and Commissioner Kara M. Stein, February 4, 2015 Av.sec g ov In fact, the SEC waivers came within days of their complaint. Here, these 2 Commissioners cite Oppenheimer trading "BILLIONS of shares of penny stocks". Clearly, they were not JUST referencing the SEC Gibraltar complaint. WHO was the SEC protecting with its complaint then waivers? The smoking gun which I have provided to the SEC on several e mails: Which came in an SEC reviewed CGFIA 10O hups://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1344394/000135448814000425/cgfi 10q.htm cgfi_10q.htm - SEC Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. www.sec.gov pg 27 "Our stock is subject to a "Global Lock" imposed by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC)" "On September 24, 2013, we were notified that the DTCC would be placing a 'Global Lock" on the Company's Class A stock as a result of actions by a third-party broker dealer. On November 11 2013, DTCC imposed the "Global Lock". Since less than 0.02% of the Company's Class A common stock shares were held within DTCC, Management chose to not undertake the expense of challenging the Global Lock. Nevertheless, shares that are held in street name (CEDE & CO), will not be able to be withdrawn from DTCC without further action." Of Course, I have hard copies if you prefer. ex clearing: The illegal SEC/DTCC Obligation Warehouse. This is CLEAR,IREEFUTABLE,INCONTROVETIBLE evidence of naked shorting by executing BD's in CGFIA. This activity took place per my Knight/UBSS TCR submitted to the SEC. So, WHY did the SEC obstruct an investigation into the ENTIRETY of the trading activity in the FINRA (and FINCEN) complaints? WHO were the executing BD's/MM's? WHO were the customers? The veracity of my information is also irrefutable and incontrovertible. Game. Set. Match. The SEC is a grossly corrupt, criminal enterprise facilitating illegal activity detailed by me so that this activity can continue. It does in 2020. The SEC solicits then uses Whistleblower information (MINE) to bring complaints AND obstruct other illegal activity while denying proper compensation to whistleblowers (ME). The SEC KNEW who the "third party BD" was in the CGFIA filing long before it filed its Opco complaint in 2015. It had my TCR in its possession in March 2013. So why did it take 5 years for the SEC to issue its preliminary EFTA00069298