. (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: (USAFLS) M : pstemIndictment FYI — Tell me what you think. Also, can you pull the messages from and see if you can tell what the dates are and who took the messages? Thanks. And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with ' 4/23/04 and 5/2/04 Assistant U.S. Atiorni.ty (USAFLS) ruary 2008 11:22 AM Hi — Our server was down for a few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. 1 wanted to talk about which girls we should drop. N and . are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. With respect to the other girls brought by , here are my th e can drop wt easily. Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did notdisclose their ages. . is a good wi nessbecause s e s hows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice. I think we should drop because I don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as "a virgin on graduation day.") That only leaves We have such g and 2 calls with What do you think? Assistant U.S. Attorney the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth kee in . vidence related to her — message padomal records, 156 calls with (we have very few phone calls with so this is key). 1702 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014613 EFTA00224589