(USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: a mil, 2008 12:37 PM . (USAFLS) : ps ein n ent I'm not supposed to be involved in tantive decisions until I get word from son high". However, my general thoughts are that you are correct. of th vidence and will be a good witness, although a reluctant one. Am I correct to assume that . and A. are still in? Their past history of commitment will have to be dealt with and it won't be easy, but agree that t ey s ould be I he fact that their commitments were post-Epstein is good., ailmsysare going to try to destroy them. Is truthful. What about ? ? in as well? I thought that she was From: Sen To: Subject: Epstein Indictment (USAFLS) [mallto uary 14, 2008 11:22 AM iii — Our server was down for a few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk about which girls we should drop. and are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. With respect to the other girls brought by , here arc my thoughts. We can dro and very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. . is a good wt ness because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops t e massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice. I think we should drop . because I don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurre . (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as "a virgin on graduation day.") That only leaves the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth keep such good docu ' elated to her — message pads, car rental records, 156 calls with and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with , so this is key). What do you think? Assistant U.S. Attorney 1690 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014612 EFTA00224588