To cc bcc Subject Re: Epstein I have not spoken to him but it was our intention to assign the decision to select a lawyer to Judge Davis not for him to represent the girls. We do not want to select the lawyer who represents the girls. I don't know who said he'd do it but it wasn't us. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Messa From: Jay Lefkowitz To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Sent: Mon Oct 22 17:10:00 2007 Subject: Re: Epstein "Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)" 10/22/2007 04:40 PM To "Jay Lefkowitz" cc costa Ale SA " (USAFLS)" Subject Epstein EFTA00213607

Jay, The Judge Davis issue is a non-starter. We've beaten that horse to death. Regarding your contention that "the attorney representative be told clearly that Mr. Epstein has agreed to pay the lawyer's hourly rate only for the time he or she spends working to effectuate settlements for the identified women," Alex and I agree that paragraph 7C is sufficient, Regarding the other points, we have made the following concessions: 1. Regarding the language concerning a lawyer whose firm is sizeable enough to litigate multiple trials simultaneously, I have removed paragraph 4 on page 3 of the letter. 2. Regarding the 150k statutory limit language, I have included a footnote which should satisfy your concern. 3. Regarding language there may be discovery to test the claims of alleged "victims", please see new paragraph 4 on page 3 which now states as criteria that the firm should have "Experience litigating against large law firms and high profile attorneys who may test the veracity of the victims' claims." I have attached the Addendum and the revised letter to Judge Davis. Jay, this needs to be concluded. Alex and I believe that this is as far as we can go. Therefore, please advise me whether we have a deal no later than COB tomorrow, Tuesday, October 23, 2007. Thanks, Jeff Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz (mailto: Sent: Friday, October 19, 2 To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: Re: EFTA00213608