(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: n a ary 25. 2008 9 59 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Question regarding use of Grand Jury Ili — I have received two conflicting points of view regarding this question, so I thought I should ask the . Here is my situation: I have been involved in 'long-term investigation of I ild exploitation case. 'Throughout the investigation. I 1 have preseled evidence and testimony to Grand Jury Some of that evidence and testimony related to six victims (of 'total of 19 victims), including the live testimony of one of those victims. I also began presenting evidence related to what I called tdraft proposed indictment." For various reasons, the indictment has been delayed about 9 months. And, for other strategic reasons, we have decided to drop the six victims referenced above, and replaced them with 'different six victims. The question is now raised as to whether I should continue presenting to Grand Jury', with' 404(b)-type instruction related to the evidence of the six dropped victims and some sort ofinstruction regarding the initial IL "draft proposed indictment", or whether I should present Grand Jury B, excluding any testimony regarding those six victims. One other consideration — Grand Jury is due to expire in August. and I anticipate that the investigation will continue for quite some time after indi ent. It is possible that the 6 dropped victims will be re-added in, superseding indictment. Thank you. I Marie Villajafia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax Tracking: 1556 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014627 EFTA00223771