From: (USAFLS) Sonbli ruary 25, 2008 9:59 AM To: (USAFLS) Su Question regarding use of Grand Jury Hi — I have received two conflicting points of view regarding this question, so I thought I should ask the exp ..Here is my situation: 1 have been involved in' long-term investigation of I ild exploitation case. Throughout the investigation, I have prese ed evidence and testimony to Grand Jury I Some of that evidence and testimony related to six victims (of I total of 19 victims), including the live testimony of one of those victims. I also began presenting evidence related to what I called '"draft proposed indictment." For various reasons, the indictment has been r delayed about 9 months. And, r other strategic reasons, we have decided to drop the six victims referenced above, and replaced them with different six victims. The question is now raised as to whether I should continue presenting to Grand Jury', with' 404(b)-type instruction related to the evidence of the six dropped victims and some sort of instruction regarding the initial i "draft proposed indictment", or whether I should present Grand Jury B, excluding any testimony regarding those six victims. One other consideration — Grand Jury is due to expire in August, and I anticipate that the investigation will continue for quite some time after indi ant. It is possible that the 6 dropped victims will be re-added in 'superseding indictment. Thank you. I Marie Villafafia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax Tracking: 1547 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014624 EFTA00223768