Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 2:05 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Cc: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: New proposed response to Jay Something which is a nullity lacks any legal import. If it has been withdrawn, then the item had import at one time, but it no longer does. If the December 2007 letter is viewed as an offer, there was no acceptance, or it has been rejected. Consequently, the offer no longer has an legal import. We are obligated to provide a copy of the non-prosecution agreement to petitioners, whatever that agreement is. If the December 2007 letter never became a part of the agreement, and the government and Epstein are in agreement as to that issue, then we can produce the September 2007 agreement and the addendum. Are we at that point? Dexter Original Message From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 1:54 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: FW: New proposed response to Jay Importance: High Dexter -- If we call it "a nullity" instead of "withdrawn" how does that affect the issue with the Jane Does? A. Marie Villafafia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 Original Message From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 1:52 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: RE: New proposed response to Jay Marie, Please substitute the word "withdrawn" in the first sentence with "a nullity" 179 EFTA00193321