To: Subject: (USAFLS) Re: Epstein suit in the news New article online re: letter from Acosta. Your mentioned. From: USAFLS) To: R. Sent: Tue Mar 22 13:27:21 2011 Subject: Epstein suit in the news Just FYI — The victims' rights suit is back in the news. or I may be reaching out to you re affidavits or hearing dates. Assistant U.S. Attorney Fax From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: (USAFLS) Monday, March 28, 2011 11:57 PM Emailing: CVRA Omnibus Response.wpd CVRA Omnibus Response.wpd <<CVRA Omnibus Response.wpd» Hi -- I am headed home now. Can you tell me if you think this is too cerebral99999 And take a look at 2010 WL 5108692. The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: CVRA Omnibus Response.wpd Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. From: Sent: (USAFLS) Monday, March 28, 2011 10:59 AM EFTA00206487

To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Conversation with Roy Black - Redacted Materials Attachments: Facts response.wpd Hi everyone — I am going to be in Miami tomorrow to meet with about some of these things. I started drafting a response to a number of issues, one being a response to the allegations of "fact." And those allegations, if we had agreed with them, would have violated DOJ policy. (See footnote I of the attached.) There is something to be said for Mr. Black's raising of this objection. For example, in one of the letters filed by Cassell, writes something to the effect of, "we were prepared to indict Mr. Epstein so, obviously, we believe that we have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed these crimes." This obviously is a comment on Epstein's guilt. If another U.S. Attorney's Office tried to indict Mr. Epstein in the future, it would be held up as an instance of the "Department of Justice" poisoning the jury pool. I do not believe that Professor Cassell has advised his clients that this will be the effect of his filing. Shall we discuss tomorrow? «Facts response.wpd>> Assistant U.S. Attorney Fax From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 10:45 AM To: 1 (USAFLS)• (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Subject: Conversation with Roy Black - Redacted Materials Colleagues, I just spoke with Roy Black regarding the U.S. Attorney's Correspondence materials the victims seek to have unredacted. I told him we advised Cassell we had no independent objection to the public filing of the correspondence. Black told me they intended to file a notice today advising the court that Epstein intended to object, and would be filing a detailed legal memo by next Monday. Black said they would send us a courtesy copy by the end of this week. Black will assert three grounds: (1) some of the correspondence contains material covered by Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e); (2) the correspondence included plea negotiations; and (3) victims' counsel could not be trusted to keep material from the press. Black advised he believed the five-page letter had been leaked to the Daily Beast by the victims' lawyers. EFTA00206488