I will get back to you as soon as I can. Thanks, ----Original Message From: Aitken, Lee [mailto: Sent: Thursda March 24. 2011 4:07 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Jeffrey epstein prosecution Dear Ms. I am an editor at both Newsweek and the Daily Beast website. I left a phone message last week but have not received a call back. Now we are facing a deadline for posting on the Daily Beast tonight, so I'd like to give you another chance to respond to our query. We have obtained a five-page letter you wrote to attorney Jay Lefkowitz on December 13, 2007 protesting charges of misconduct on your part and laying out several details about your interactions with Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Your co-signer, Alex Accosta, has already acknowledged the vaiidity of this letter, but I would also like you to confirm that it came from your office. If you have any further comment to make about it or facts to add about this case I would love to hear back from you right away. We plan to post a story about the negotiations behind the Non-Prosecution agreement at 8 pm this evening. Thank you for your time and prompt attention, Lee Aitken From: (USAFLS) < > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 5:53 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT Sure. I will add and send out. Ok with everyone? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monc March 21, 2011 5:52 PM To: , (USAFLS); (USAFLS); . (USAFLS); USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- pleading is pubic -- PLEASE REVIEW URGENT Should there be a final sentence such as the following? Because the matter remains pending in court, it would be inappropriate at this time to provide additional comment on the merits of the motion. EFTA00206403