From: " To: ' Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 16:02:06 +0000 Yes indeed From: USANYS) < Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2020 11:03 To: >; Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? Perfect, thank you! Also, if convicted on all counts (I know you hate this), she faces a total of 35 years? From: Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 10:32 AM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? also correct (none of this conduct would have fit that statute in any event, because — unlike what we charged Epstein with — there was no commercial sex here, no monetary payments, but whatMays about the timing of that statute is exactly right) From: Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2020 10:30 To: 1 .=> Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? (USANYS) < As an FYI, and the team should correct me if I'm wrong, the sex trafficking statute with which Epstein was charged (18 USC 1591) was enacted in 2000—after the conduct alleged here. From: Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 10:28 AM To: USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? correct From USANYS) < > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2020 10:27 To: Cc: la Subject: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? EFTA00094028

United States Department of Justice U.S. Attorney's Office [Southern District of New York EFTA00094029