What is document EFTA00020439?

This document contains email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding her bail application.

Who is mentioned in this document?

Key individuals mentioned include Ghislaine Maxwell, David Oscar Markus, and attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office. Other individuals mentioned are Christian Everdell, Bobbi C. Sternheim and Mark S. Cohen. Prince Andrew and Michael Cohen are mentioned as entities in the document metadata.

What does this document reveal?

The document reveals the government's opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bail motion and provides insight into communications between the defense and prosecution regarding the appeal process. It also highlights the application of a protective order to the case.

What is document EFTA00020439?

This document contains email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding her bail application.

Who is mentioned in this document?

Key individuals mentioned include Ghislaine Maxwell, David Oscar Markus, and attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office. Other individuals mentioned are Christian Everdell, Bobbi C. Sternheim and Mark S. Cohen. Prince Andrew and Michael Cohen are mentioned as entities in the document metadata.

What does this document reveal?

The document reveals the government's opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bail motion and provides insight into communications between the defense and prosecution regarding the appeal process. It also highlights the application of a protective order to the case.

EFTA00020439 - EFTA00020441

Document EFTA00020439 appears to be an email exchange between David Oscar Markus, Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, and attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, regarding the case of *U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell*.

The document consists of email correspondence concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail pending appeal to the Second Circuit. Markus informs the U.S. Attorney's Office of his engagement to represent Maxwell in her appeal and seeks confirmation of the government's position on the bail motion. The government confirms their opposition to the motion and states their intention to file a response. The emails also discuss access to docket entries and the existing protective order in the case.

Key Highlights

•The U.S. Government opposed Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail.
•David Oscar Markus was engaged to represent Ghislaine Maxwell in her appeal.
•The case is governed by a protective order (ECF No. 36).

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

Perversion of Justice

Julie K. Brown

Covers Maxwell's involvement

Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography: The Shocking True Story of Jeffrey Epstein's Madam

Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York

Document Information

Bates Range

EFTA00020439 - EFTA00020441

Pages

Document Content

Page 1 - EFTA00020439

From: M I®usa.doj.gov> To: David Oscar Markus <[email protected]>, (USANYS)" @ti.sa.doj.gov> Cc: "ausa.doj.gov> Subject: RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:15:15 +0000 David, Confirmed, the Government opposes the motion for bail and intends to file a response. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 212-63 From: David Oscar Markus <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 11:02 AM To: Subject: Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell We are preparing our motion for bail in the Second Circuit and need to inform the Court of the government's position. We intend to let the Court know that the Government's opposes Ms. Maxwell's motion and intends to file a response. Please confirm. Thanks, David --David Oscar Markus EFTA00020439

Page 2 - EFTA00020440

markuslaw.com 305-379= From (USANYS) ausdoLgov> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 7:10 PM To: David Oscar Markus Cc: (USANYS) (USANYS); Christian Everdell; Bobbi Sternheim ([email protected]). Mark S. Cohen Subject: RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell David, Thanks for letting us know that you'll be counsel on this appeal. As an initial matter, the majority of the docket entries you've referenced do not appear to be redacted. In any event, you may obtain these materials from defense counsel -- I've copied them here. This case is already governed by a protective order (ECF No. 36), which is binding on all counsel. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 (212) 637-= From: David Oscar Markus <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 5:33 PM To: >: EFTA00020440

Page 3 - EFTA00020441

Zusa.doj,gov> Subject: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell Good afternoon counsel: I have been engaged to represent Ghislaine Maxwell in her appeal from the denial of her third application for bail. In preparing this appeal, I will need access to certain unredacted documents, including docket entries 4, 18, 22, 97, 100, 103, 106, 159, 160, 165, 171, 169. Do you have any objection to me having access to these unredacted documents? (There may be additional documents that I need, but I have not identified them as of yet.) Pm happy to enter into a protective order with the government if you believe that is necessary. I plan on filing the appeal next week, so I would appreciate it if you could get back to me as soon as possible. Thank you, David --David Oscar Markus markuslaw.com 305-379 EFTA00020441