EFTA00015277 - EFTA00015279
Document EFTA00015277 consists of a series of email exchanges regarding a "Maxwell Suppression Hearing". The emails involve discussions about legal documents, individuals involved in the case, and procedural questions.
The document appears to be a chain of emails among individuals at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's suppression hearing. The emails discuss requests for specific documents, including a decision by Judge Netburn (referred to as Exhibit Ito the def motion) and an original application to Judge Sweet. The email chain also identifies Stan Pottinger as a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented the plaintiff in a civil action and mentions the filing of multiple Motions of Law (MOLs) by the defense to evade page limits.
Key Highlights
- •The document relates to Ghislaine Maxwell's suppression hearing.
- •The emails involve requests for legal documents and information related to the case.
- •Stan Pottinger from Boies Schiller is identified as representing the plaintiff in the civil action.
- •The document mentions Alison J. Nathan in the subject line.
Frequently Asked Questions
Books for Further Reading
Document Information
Bates Range
EFTA00015277 - EFTA00015279
Pages
3
Document Content
Page 1 - EFTA00015277
From: To: (USANYS)" (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:54:46 +0000 Attachments: Ex._H_Sealed.pdf Here it is — Ex H. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 3:45 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing And can you send me MJ Netbum's decision? Exhibit Ito the def motion, I think From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:58 AM To: (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re A1N/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented the plaintiff in the civil action. The two letters we submitted in connection with our All Writs Application are attached. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:53 AM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Another Q: who's Stan Pottinger? From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:53 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS)<Mal> Subject: RE: Question re A1N/Maxwell Suppression Hearing From: ( USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:40 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) ‹ > Subject: RE: Question re A1N/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Can I see our original application to Judge Sweet? And I assume there was no transcript before Judge S? EFTA00015277
Page 2 - EFTA00015278
From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:45 PM To: (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing In the spirit of completeness, I'm also attaching their replies. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:20 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) >; Subject: Re: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing ire Goodness! Associate U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York On Jun 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM, (USANYS) < (USANYS) < (USANYS) < wrote: She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court's page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that over the last few years. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:25 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Dumb Q: why does Maxwell have two memos of law? From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:19 PM To: (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing (USANYS) < (USANYS) < Per our discussion, I am attaching: (1) Maxwell's two briefs raising the suppression argument; (2) the transcript of the McMahon proceedings and her opinion (Ex D, E, G); (3) our brief (see pp 59-115); and (4) the exhibits we attached to our motion (Ex 4-7). Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions "at a later time" ahead of trial. Thanks very much. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 10:09 AM To: (USANYS) EFTA00015278
Page 3 - EFTA00015279
Cc: (USANYS) ; Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing (USANYS) < Sure, set a time other than 2:00. I'm in the office. Or Webex From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:11 AM To: (USANTS) < Cc: I (USANYS) ; (USANYS) < Subject: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Hi=, We had an issue come up related to the upcoming suppression hearing (no date set yet, although we expect one) related to that we'd like your thoughts on. Let us know a convenient time to stop by over the next few days, thanks. Chief, Public Corruption Unit U.S. Attorney's Office Southern District of New York EFTA00015279
Entities Mentioned
Alison J. Nathan
PERSON
David Boies
PERSON
American lawyer and chairman
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
British socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
JP
J. Stanley Pottinger
PERSON • 2 mentions
American novelist and lawyer (1940–2024)
Joi Ito
PERSON
Japanese-American activist, entrepreneur, and venture capitalist
McMahon
PERSON
SW
Sweet
PERSON
Boies Schiller
ORGANIZATION
German playwright, poet, philosopher and historian (1759–1805)
Statistics
Pages:3
Entities:8
Avg. OCR:0.9%
Sponsored