Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 439 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2009

Page 1 of 4 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON ------------------' Related cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 -----------------' OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel filed March 6, 2009 (D.E. #54 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #64 in Case No. 08-80381); (2) Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages with Proposed Order filed March 18, 2009 (D.E. #55 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #65 in Case No. 08-80381); (3) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Response to Motion to Compel (D.E. #62 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #72 in Case No. 08-80381); (4) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Requests for Production filed March 2, 2009 ( D.E. #61 in Case No. 08-80381); (5) Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 17, 2009 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 439 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2009

Page 2 of 4 (D.E. #71 in Case #08-80232 and D.E. #75 in Case #08-80381); (6) Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 29, 2009 (D.E. #79 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #79 in Case #08-80381; D.E. # 43 in Case #08-80993; and, D.E. #33 in Case #08-80994); (7) Defendant's Motion to File Reply to Response to Motion to Compel filed May 18, 2009 (D.E. #92 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #94 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #49 in Case #08-80994); (8) Third Party Zinoview's Motion for Protective Order filed November 9, 2009 (D.E. #131 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #132 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #84 in Case #08-80994); (9) Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Request for Production filed April 2, 2009 (D.E. #59 in 08-80232; D.E. #69 in 08-80381; D.E. #26 in 08-80993; and, D.E. #24 in 08-80994); and (10) Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Set of Interrogatories filed April 2, 2009 (D.E. #60 in 08-80232; D.E. #70 in 08-80381; D.E. #27 in 08-80993; and, D.E. #25 in 08-80994). Having reviewed the pleadings filed incident to these matters, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: (1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel filed March 6, 2009 (D.E. #54 in Case No. 08- 80232 and D.E. #64 in Case No. 08-80381) is GRANTED nune pro tune; (2) Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages with Proposed Order filed March 18, 2009 (D.E. #55 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #65 in Case No. 08-80381) is GRANTED nune pro tune; (3) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to 2 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 439 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2009

Page 3 of 4 Response to Motion to Compel (D.E. #62 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #72 in Case No. 08-80381) is GRANTED nune pro tune; (4) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Requests for Production filed March 2, 2009 ( D.E. #61 in Case No. 08-80381) is DENIED AS MOOT; (5) Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 17, 2009 (D.E. #71 in Case #08- 80232 and D.E. #75 in Case #08-80381) is GRANTED nune pro tune; (6) Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 29, 2009 (D.E. #79 in Case #08- 80232; D.E. #79 in Case #08-80381; D.E. # 43 in Case #08-80993; and, D.E. #33 in Case #08-80994) is GRANTED nune pro tune; (7) Defendant's Motion to File Reply to Response to Motion to Compel filed May 18, 2009 (D.E. #92 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #94 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #49 in Case #08-80994) is GRANTED nune pro tune; (8) Third Party Zinoview's Motion for Protective Order filed November 9, 2009 (D.E. #131 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #132 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #84 in Case #08-80994) is DENIED AS MOOT; (9) Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Request for Production filed April 2, 2009 (D.E. #59 in 08-80232; D.E. #69 in 08-80381; D.E. #26 in 08-80993; and, D.E. #24 in 08-80994) is STRICKEN as a duplicate filing as the identical Motion has been filed correctly in the lead case file of 08-80119 3 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 439 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2009