1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009

Page 1 of 4 2 Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009

Page 2 of 4 3 Defendants. ____________________________________/ DOE II, CASE NO.: 09- 80469-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09- 80591-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 102 CASE NO.: 09- 80656-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NOS. 101 AND 102'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence (DE 114), filed May 26, 2009. The Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009

Page 3 of 4 4 motion is fully briefed and ripe for review. See DE’s 151, 168. The Court has carefully considered the motion, response, and reply, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court intends to GRANT Plaintiffs’ motion for an order for the preservation of evidence. However, Plaintiffs’ proposed order is overly broad. Accordingly, the Court directs the parties to attempt to agree upon language for an order directing Defendant to preserve evidence and submit an agreed order to the Court no later than July 20, 2009. If the parties cannot agree, then each party shall submit a proposed order by the foregoing date. In the interim and until further order of the Court, Defendant shall not destroy any evidence in his possession, custody, or control that is relevant to these cases or that may lead to the discovery of evidence relevant to these cases. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 6 day of July, 2009 th _________________________________ KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Copies furnished to: all counsel of record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2009