Epstein Secrets

2 Fort Lauderdale. 1 Telepho Facsimil Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah° 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake • Telephone Facsimile: E-Mai Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 This response is not filed on behalf of the U

against him because of Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. See Exhibit A to Epstein's Mot. to Intervene, DE #93-1 (arguing that pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 410, Epstein is entitled to some sort of protective order). If this pleading has a familiar ring to it, it is because Epstein has presented it to this

ally-negotiated plea deal. Paul G. Cassell teaches criminal law, criminal procedure, and crime victims’ rights at the S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah. Before coming to Utah, he was President of the Stanford Law Review, a law clerk for then-Judge Antonin Scalia on the D.C, Circuit and for Chief Just

r discovery of the correspondence between the U.S. and Epstein’s attorneys during the plea negotiations. Epstein’s attorneys intervened, arguing that Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 create a privilege for plea negotiations, barring release of the correspondence. They also argued that the

e (954) 524-2822 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: [email protected] and Li Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe il

ane Doc 2 to release materials that are plainly the privileged opinion work-product of the attorneys, that constitute settlement negotiations under Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure II, and that contain information about matters occurring before the grand jury, which arc strictly confidenti

egally-negotiated plea deal. Paul G. Cassell teaches criminal law, criminal procedure. and crime victims' rights at the.. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah. Before coming to Utah. he was President of the Stanford Law Review, a law clerk for then-Judge Antonin Scalia on the D.C. Circuit and for Chief Ju

r discovery of the correspondence between the M. and Epstein's attorneys during the plea negotiations. Epstein's attorneys intervened, arguing that Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure I I create a privilege for plea negotiations, barring release of the correspondence. They also argued that t