Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
lusion."' United States v. Jordan, 915 F.2d 622, 628 (11th Cir. 1990) (quoting Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525 (1987) (itself quoting Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983))). There is no basis for departing from that rule. Given the strong evidence that Congress did not intend retroactively to a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
lusion."' United States v. Jordan, 915 F.2d 622, 628 (11th Cir. 1990) (quoting Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525 (1987) (itself quoting Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983))). There is no basis for departing from that rule. Given the strong evidence that Congress did not intend retroactively to a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
lusion."' United States v. Jordan, 915 F.2d 622, 628 (11th Cir. 1990) (quoting Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525 (1987) (itself quoting Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983))). There is no basis for departing from that rule. Given the strong evidence that Congress did not intend retroactively to a
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
lusion."' United States v. Jordan, 915 F.2d 622, 628 (11th Cir. 1990) (quoting Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525 (1987) (itself quoting Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983))). There is no basis for departing from that rule. Given the strong evidence that Congress did not intend retroactively to a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
lusion."' United States v. Jordan, 915 F.2d 622, 628 (11th Cir. 1990) (quoting Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525 (1987) (itself quoting Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983))). There is no basis for departing from that rule. Given the strong evidence that Congress did not intend retroactively to a
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (101)
Entities connected to both Jennifer Lopez and Russello v. United States
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON479 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ Russello
LB
Leon Black
PERSON185 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ Russello
Prince Andrew
PERSON159 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Russello
United States
LOCATION144 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ Russello
George W. Bush
PERSON136 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Russello
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON129 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ Russello
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON113 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ Russello
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON91 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ Russello
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION75 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ Russello
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON64 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ Russello
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON55 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ Russello
John Kerry
PERSON54 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Russello
Oliver Stone
PERSON49 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Russello
EV
Evans
PERSON45 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Russello
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON32 w/ Jennifer·4 w/ Russello
Chuck Grassley
PERSON31 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Russello
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION27 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Russello
EL
Ellis
PERSON26 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Russello
RJ
Robert C. Josefsberg
PERSON26 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Russello
Schumer
PERSON24 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Russello