Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (101)
Entities connected to both Jennifer Lopez and Tvkarsky
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON479 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
LB
Leon Black
PERSON185 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Prince Andrew
PERSON159 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
United States
LOCATION144 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
George W. Bush
PERSON136 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON129 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON113 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON91 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION75 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON64 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON55 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
John Kerry
PERSON54 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Oliver Stone
PERSON49 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
EV
Evans
PERSON45 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON32 w/ Jennifer·4 w/ Tvkarsky
Chuck Grassley
PERSON31 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION27 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
EL
Ellis
PERSON26 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
RJ
Robert C. Josefsberg
PERSON26 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Schumer
PERSON24 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Tvkarsky