Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
STATEMENT Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss or, alternatively, for a more definite statement of, the First Amended Complaint. Fed. R. Civ. RR. 12(b)(6) & 12(e) (2009); Loc. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). In support, Defendant states: Pleading Standard & Summary of Argument T
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
STATEMENT Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss or, alternatively, for a more definite statement of, the First Amended Complaint. Fed. R. Civ. RR. 12(b)(6) & 12(e) (2009); Loc. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). In support, Defendant states: Pleading Standard & Summary of Argument T
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
STATEMENT Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss or, alternatively, for a more definite statement of, the First Amended Complaint. Fed. R. Civ. RR. 12(b)(6) & 12(e) (2009); Loc. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). In support, Defendant states: Pleading Standard & Summary of Argument T
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
STATEMENT Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss or, alternatively, for a more definite statement of, the First Amended Complaint. Fed. R. Civ. RR. 12(b)(6) & 12(e) (2009); Loc. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). In support, Defendant states: Pleading Standard & Summary of Argument T
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tutory phrase. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000); United S
STATEMENT Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss or, alternatively, for a more definite statement of, the First Amended Complaint. Fed. R. Civ. RR. 12(b)(6) & 12(e) (2009); Loc. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). In support, Defendant states: Pleading Standard & Summary of Argument T
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (101)
Entities connected to both Jennifer Lopez and the First Amended Complaint
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON479 w/ Jennifer·8 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON185 w/ Jennifer·7 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON159 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
United States
LOCATION144 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON136 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON129 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON113 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON91 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION75 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON64 w/ Jennifer·7 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON55 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
John Kerry
PERSON54 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
Oliver Stone
PERSON49 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
EV
Evans
PERSON45 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
Chuck Grassley
PERSON31 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON32 w/ Jennifer·4 w/ the
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION27 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
EL
Ellis
PERSON26 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
RJ
Robert C. Josefsberg
PERSON26 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the
Schumer
PERSON24 w/ Jennifer·6 w/ the