3
Shared Docs
2
Same-Page
5 / 3
Mentions
Ct. 2749, 2765, 165 L.Ed.2d 723 (2006); see also Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretati
ncluded in other provisions of the same statute."C a Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557,578, 126 S. Ct. 2749, 2765, 165 L.Ed.2d 723 (2006); see also Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 170 (2012) ("[W]here a document has used one term *1237 in one place, and a materi
r in the Executive Branch not to indict ... has long been regarded as [within] the special province of the Executive Branch, inasmuch as it is the Executive who is charged by the Constitution to 'take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.' " (quoting U.S. Const., Art. II, § 3)). This Executive Bra
as importantly, what it didn't write"); see also Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Gamer, Reading Law: The Interpretatio
ny field of statutory interpretation, it is our duty to respect not only what Congress wrote but, as importantly, what it didn't write"); see also Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Gamer, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 182 (2012) ("The familiar `easy-to-say-so-if-that-is-what-was-meant' rule of statuto
resolution of this petition for a writ of mandamus would not change. Moreover, ow opinion about pre-charge *1272 rights would not be binding on the Executive in the same way that the opinions about pension requests were not binding in? I He/Aunts Case. B. We Construe Statutes by Reading the Whole Text,
ARTICLE: Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims' Rights Act
nial Revolution in Criminal Justice: The Return of the Victim, 13 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 649, 650 (1976). 5 Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 834 (1991) (Scalia, J., concurring) (internal quotation marks omitted). See generally Douglas Evan Beloof, Paul G. Cassell & Steve J. Twist, Victims in Criminal Procedu
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017717 →need for further legislative action or even, possibly, a federal constitutional amendment. Congress is watching to see whether the Judiciary (and the Executive) will fully and fairly implement this new Act. As Senator Leahy warned, "Passage of this bill will necessitate careful oversight of its implementatio
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017726 →Entities connected to both Antonin Scalia and Executive

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Barack Obama
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSON