Epstein Secrets

e don't respond to why qs and I think we should not in this case. These are all matters within our discretion. Nonetheless, I would be interested in Marie's responses but would not answer to reporter. Marie-any suggestions?t From: USAFLS) To: Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFL.= (USAFLS); Sent: Thu Jun 17 1

ehow put it into writing. Assistant U.S. Attorne Fax From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda June 17, 2010 3:56 PM To: (USAFLS) .(USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS); (LISAFLS); SAFL i a (USAFLS) Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL These are awful. Usually we don't respond to why qs and I think we should not in this cas

Florida From: Jackie Perczek [mailto: Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 5:48 PM To: . (LISAFLS) Subject: Witness List - Edwards v. Epstein Hi Marie, Not sure if you've seen the witness list filed by Brad Edwards in the civil case - I am passing it along in case you have not seen it. Jackie Ja

rial date? Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida From: Jackie Perczek [mailto: Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 5:48 PM To: . (LISAFLS) Subject: Witness List - Edwards v. Epstein Hi Marie, Not sure if you've seen the witness list filed by Brad Edwards in the civil case - I am pas

y, August 14, 2008 2:39 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); [email protected] Subject: Re: Follow-up point Marie - In reviewing your December proposal, there are a couple of things I don't understand. 327 EFTA00190637 What limits are placed upon individuals

ks -- Jay Wiliam Ann Mario C. (USAFI-51" [email protected]> 08/1412008 12.44 PM To <letkow.ligtkiiktand.com> cc 'Atkinson. Karen (LISAFLS)' <Karen [email protected]> Subject Follow-up point Hi Jay — I forgot to mention that I can no longer argue that the Court shouldn't force us to