Epstein Secrets

ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:33:01 +0000 Importance: Normal Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god for

rter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subjec

l Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst case scenario,

sure what you mean. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Martin G. Weinberg <-> wrote: Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god for

rter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subjec

: Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst case scenario,

re what you mean. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Martin G. Weinberg c.IM > wrote: Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god for

rter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subjec

: Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst case scenario,