Epstein Secrets

caused one or more telephone calls to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. #. On August 25, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, , and traveled from Ecuador to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. #. On August 25, 2004, Defendant caused a telephone cal

activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in instructing the jury that "it was sufficient for the Government to prove tha

ctivity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in instructing the jury that "it was sufficient for the Government to prove that

telephone calls 58 EFTA02857577 to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. 36. On August 25, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Ecuador to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 38. On August 25, 2004, Defendant caused a telephone c

activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in instructing the jury that "it was sufficient for the Government to prove tha

used one or more telephone calls to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8. 36. On August 25, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, I , and traveled from Ecuador to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 38. On August 25, 2004, Defendant caused a telephone ca