Epstein Secrets

puted "facts" is egregious. It is well settled that mere allegations do not constitute "facts" for purposes of summary judgment. See, e.g., Metro. Dade County v. Wilkey, 414 So. 2d 269, 271 (FIa. 3d DCA. 1982) ("[P]leadings are not admissible in evidence to prove or disprove a fact in issue.") (citing Hine

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-De

tein firm imploded. And there was a 6 complaint that was brought by Bill Scherer I 7 believe down -- I don't know if it was Broward 8 County or Dade County. 9 THE COURT: Yeah, I'm familiar with all 10 that. 11 I remember that day. Do you remember that 12 day, Mr. Edwards? 13 MR. EDWARDS: I reme

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J.

hstein firm imploded. And there was a 6 complaint that was brought by Bill Scherer 7 believe down -- I don't know if it was Broward 8 County or Dade County. 9 TEE COURT: Yeah, I'm familiar with all 10 that. 11 I remember that day. Do you remember that 12 day, Mr. Edwards? 13 MR. EDWARDS: I reme

, Esq. FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 7 EFTA00613507 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, -vs- SCOTT ROTHSTEIN,.individually, and BRADL