Epstein Secrets

re are any that you have not received from the USAO or CEOS, please advise and we will fedex them to you without delay. Chicago Hong Kong London Munich Now York San Francisco Washington, D.C. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001665 EFTA00209844 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP John Roth, Esq. June 19, 2008 P

the communication itself—not the resulting act. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Murrell, underscores the point: The defendant in Bailey contended that attempt under § 2422(6) 'requires the specific intent to commit illegal sexual acts rather than just the intent to persuade or solic

finality in this matter. QT1 Kenneth W. Starr cc: Assistant Attorney General Chicago First First Assistant U.S. Attorney Hong Kong London Munich Nov Yost San Francesco Washington. D.0 EFTA00214707 12/07/07 FRI 15:31 FAX 1 213 680 8500 K I RKLANDILEILL IS LLP Ilt] 003 ALSTON&B1RD UT

sex act himself, he would nevertheless violate §2422(b)." United States v. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11th Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (02' Cu. 2000) ("Congress has made a clear choice to criminalize persuasion and the attempt to persuade, not the performance of t

re arc any that you have not received from the USAO or CEOS, please advise and we will fedex them to you without delay. Chicago Hong Kong London Munich Now York San Francisco Washington,. 3505-019 Page 2 of 63 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00003274 EFTA00

a, I was a part of the prosecution team that prosecuted the first case in the country under the federal Violence Against Women Act. United States v. Bailey, 112 F.3d 758 (4th Cir.), cert denied, 522 U.S. 896 (1997). The case went to trial and the defendant was sentenced to life in prison. I also spearh

neth W. Starr cc: Honorable Alice Fisher, Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney Chicago Hong Kong London Munich Now York San Francisco Washington, D.C. EFTA00176207 12/07/07 FRI 15:34 FAX 1 213 080 8500 K I RKLAND&ELL I S LLP tr/I008 HERBERT J. STERN

sex act himself, he would nevertheless violate §2422(b)." United States'. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (1 I th Cir. 2004). See also United States'. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (61° Cir. 2000) ("Congress has made a clear choice to criminalize persuasion and the attempt to persuade, not the performance of t

encing in the same manner as would the appearance and statements of a member of your Office or the FBI. Chicago • Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich San Francisco Washington, D.C. EFTA01718515 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LIP R. Alexander Acosta November 29, 2007 Page 2 With that said, I respectfully

sex act himself, he would nevertheless violate §2422(b)." United States v. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11th Cu. 2004). See also United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (61° Cir. 2000) ("Congress has made a clear choice to criminalize persuasion and the attempt to persuade, not the performance of t

there are any that you have not received from the USAO or CEOS, please advise and we will fedex them to you without delay. Chicago Hong Kong London Munich New York San Francisco Washington, D.C. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012136 --- PAGE BREAK --- KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP John Roth, Esq. June 19, 2008 Page 2 As y

s the communication itself—not the resulting act. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Murrell, underscores the point: The defendant in Bailey contended that attempt under § 2422(b) ‘requires the specific intent to commit illegal sexual acts rather than just the intent to persuade or solicit