Epstein Secrets

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 7:36 AM To: Erdoes, Mary E; Jes Staley Subject: fyi I think you should ask Wendall to recall the meeting he had with Sussman an= Glenn. Glenn was unequivocal., adamant ,and loud in fro

y, May 30, 2011 7:36 AM To: Erdoes, Mary E; Jes Staley Subject: fyi I think you should ask Wendall to

al is =bundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only=what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condr=n that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as=a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desi

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:47 AM To: Erdoes, Mary E Cc: Staley, Jes; Shenker, Nina O Subject: Re: fyi info needed, -- managed acct NAV at 10/05 10 /06. realized value,= .. redemption schedule, we have documnet

al is =bundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only=what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condr=n that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as=a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desi

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:01 AM To: Erdoes, Mary E Cc: Staley, Jes; Shenker, Nina O Subject: Re: fyi thank you On Mon Ma 30 2011 at 12:53 P= Erdoes, Mary E > wrote: Jeffrey- Yes, we are going to have Condr

al is =bundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only=what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condr=n that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as=a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desi