Epstein Secrets

documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards. MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which DRAFT !!!! NOT PROOFREAD EFTA00804

urt matter. MR. SCAROLA: We are. MR. LINK: I may have misunderstood, because this is a bankruptcy declaration. And there isn't anything in Judge Hafele's order that talks about bankruptcy testimony or spoke that you can inquire about. Obviously, by signing this he has adopted every statement in t

m from a disc that we started reviewing on February 25th, 2018? I think that's a legitimate question, pursuant to both -- well, pursuant to Judge Hafele's order, not pursuant to the bankruptcy order. But your question hasn't been tailored that way. MR. SCAROLA: And that's because that's not the q

Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger et al.. 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 ax By: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS Florida Bar No.: 542075 3 EFTA00727951

YH TO J U ST ICE COM Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos a Lehrman, P.L. May 10, 2010 VIA FEDEX PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 7935 2823 3787 Honorable Donald W. Hafele Main Judicial Complex Palm Beach County Courthouse 205 North Dixie Highway Room 11.1204 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: EW v. Jeffrey Epste

8XXXXMB AB Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendant's Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Interrogatories Hearing on May 12, 2010 O 8:45 AM Dear Judge Hafele: Enclosed please find EW's Responses to Defendant's Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Interrogatories set for May 12, 2010 at 8:45AM. Should yo

pley, P.A. Counsel for Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Brittany N. Henderson Edwards Pottinger LLC °tense or anner a e, ersstng, cards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the Utah University of Doe Peter E. Shapiro Shapiro Law uite 3000 ounse or ., . . an

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I think that's a legitimate question, pursuant to both -- well, pursuant to Judge Hafele's order, not pursuant to the bankruptcy order. But your question hasn't been tailored that way. MR. SCAROLA: And that's because that's not the q

ourt matter. MR. SCAROLA: We are. MR. LINK: I may have misunderstood, because this is a bankruptcy declaration. And there isn't anything in Judge Hafele's order that talks about bankruptcy testimony or spoke that you can inquire about. Obviously, by signing this, he has adopted every statement in

tion pending in the 13 above-named court. 14 The appearances at said time and place 15 were as follows: 16 FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, PL 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Does, L.N. and E.W. 18 425 North Andrews Avenue Suite 2 19 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Tel: (954) 52

to the form, and in 15 MR. YAREMA: Object to the form. 15 addition this is irrelevant and has already 16 A Fifth. 16 been addressed by Judge Hafele as an 17 Q Have you ever physically touched C.L.? 17 inappropriate question. That's my 18 MR. YAREMA: Object to the form. 18 objection. 19

al Support (561) 835-0220 EFTA00181799 Page 5 33: L,8 grounds10:25 guess 95:4 guest58:3 95:19 guilty41:18 guise21:24 H habit30:23 57:19 Hafele 80:16 Hafele's81:6 68:7,14,19 70:8 74:24 75:5 half 7:19 HAIND100:17 hands45:20 hanging 93:21 happened 28:9 34:4 39:25 happening 84:6 hara

ocuments or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which case? MR. SCAROLA: This is the subp

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I think that's a legitimate question, pursuant to both -- well, pursuant to Judge Hafele's order, not pursuant to the bankruptcy order. But your question hasn't been tailored that way. MR. SCAROLA: And that's because that's not the q

else did he tell you? MR. LINK: So, I'm going to instruct you not to answer based both on attorney- client privilege and exceeds the scope of Judge Hafele's order. I" Epstein Depo. Tr. at 22. Clearly Epstein put forward the conversation with his attorney about the disc in paragraph four of his declara

HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANCTIONS AND COSTS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. ("Farmer Jaffe"), through counsel, hereby moves this honorable Court for an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should N

er. Ultimately, following a summary judgment motion by Edwards, Epstein dropped his lawsuit; currently pending before Judge Crow's successor, Judge Hafele, is a follow-on action, Edwards v. Epstein, for malicious prosecution by Epstein in filing his lawsuit in the first place. 6 EFTA00799319 Case 0

Pottinger LLC 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale. FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: Attorneys for Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Scott J. Link, Esq. Link &Rockenbach, PA. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: Fax: Attorneys for

ADMITTED THAT HE POSSESSED DOCUMENTS FROM THE DISK IN QUESTION Epstein has previously admitted in the related state court proceedings before Judge Hafele that he possessed documents from the disk in question. Now, before this Court, he appears to take a different position. For example, Epstein states