Epstein Secrets

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 08076.08089 08/04/2009 Bradley Edwards Spencer Kuvin Transcript of Alfredo Rodriguez Deposition

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE 11Q FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy r

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

S. FISTOS & LEHRMAN Dated: February 23, 2011 Total of 159 pages EFTA00310047 Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 08076-08089 08/04/2009 Bradley Edwards 1 Spencer Kuvin Transcript of Alfredo Rodriguez Deposition

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 03550-03574 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Pr

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

tion pending in the 13 above-named court. 14 The appearances at said lime and place 15 were as follows: 16 FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, PL. 17 Attorneys for PinintilTs June Does, L.N. and 10 • c: 524-2820 20 BY: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. 21 MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. 22

44 22 one: 22 23 (Via tekpbone) 23 24 24 25 25 Page 6 Page 8 I Appearances contimied... 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 On behalf of the Plaintiff. Jane Doe II: 3 ISIDRO MANUEL GARCIA, ESQUIRE 2 — — — GARCIA EI.K1NS & BOEHRINGER 3 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video 4 I record. This is Media No.