Epstein Secrets

iled 04/12/18 Page 12 of 12 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates Florida Bar No.: 225657 Attorney E-Mail(s): [email protected] 644 Cesery Blvd. #250 Jacksonville, FL 3

ed the adequacy of Mr. Edwards's privilege log years ago. 6 EFTA00795932 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6358 Filed 04/12/18 Page 7 of 12 At one point, the State Court—the only Court with jurisdiction over the adequacy of the log— agreed that the log was insufficient and then before requiring a revised log reversed

am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A). FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954)524-2820 Telephone (954)524-2822 Facsimile By: /s/Seth Lehrman Seth Lehr

materials which the Circuit Court would not allow. See Epstein's Motion to Compel, DE 807. III. Memorandum of Law A. Discovery Issues Related to the State Court Issued Subpoena Arc Not Properly Before the Bankruptcy Court Despite Epstein's stated position to the contrary, neither 28 U.S.C. §§ 152 or 1334 co

pley, P.A. Counsel for Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Brittany N. Henderson Edwards Pottinger LLC °tense or anner a e, ersstng, cards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the Utah University of Doe Peter E. Shapiro Shapiro Law uite 3000 ounse or ., . . an

ns is of no moment in these proceedings. The alleged privileged e-mails and all issues related to privilege and waiver are currently pending before the State Court. CONCLUSION As the sole basis for seeking to hold Epstein liable for a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order, Movants contend that Epstein's

, P.A. rd Counsel for Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Brittany N. Henderson Edwards Pottinger LLC ounse or armer a e, eissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of h Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Peter E. Shapiro Sha.iro Law Coun

o answer those questions is of no moment. The alleged privileged e-mails and all issues related to privilege and waiver are currently pending before the State Court. 5 EFTA00794242 CONCLUSION As the sole basis for seeking to hold Epstein liable for a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order, Edwards cont

unse or ra ey wars Bradley J. Edwards Brittany N. Henderson Edwards Pottinger LLC e, Suite 2 301-3268 ounse or armer affe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the Utah University of Doe Peter E. Shapiro Sha iro Law uite 3000 Counsel for L.M., E.W

ns is of no moment in these proceedings. The alleged privileged e-mails and all issues related to privilege and waiver are currently pending before the State Court. CONCLUSION As the sole basis for seeking to hold Epstein liable for a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order, Edwards contends that Epstein'

HSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 RESPONSE OF= BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. AND FARMER. JAFFE. WEISSING, EDWARDS. FISTOS & LEHRMAN. P.L TO CREDITORS MOTION TO CLARIFY PRIOR ORDERS (a minor victim of sex offenses), Bradley J. Edwards, and Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fisto

relevance, burdensomeness, and attorney-client and other privileges regarding the Razorback Creditors' subpoena. Instead, these issues are left to the State Court judge presiding over their case to decide. I. BACKGROUND The procedural background surrounding the Razorback Creditor's motion is important to t