3
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
3 / 5
Mentions
CRIMINAL LAW: CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS DURING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS? APPLYING THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT BEFORE CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE FILED
e disposition of the case. Id. “4 Landon Thomas Jr., From Paradise to County Jail: A Billionaire Financial Adviser Will Serve 18 Months in Sex Case, N.Y. Times, July 1, 2008, at C1. 4) See Michele Dargan, Feds Say They Treated Epstein Victims Fairly, Palm Beach Daily News (Apr. 8, 2011, 7:23 PM), http
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017610 →d Nov. 26, 2013). #2 See Jane Doe Motion, supra note 40, at 3-4; Abby Goodnough, Questions of Preferential Treatment Are Raised in Florida Sex Case, N.Y. Times, Sept. 3, 2006, at A19. 43 The U.S. Attorney responsible for the plea deal later revealed that after negotiations started, "what followed was
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017610 →e Next Step for a Maturing Victim Rights Movement: Enforcing Crime Victim Rights in the Courts, 33 McGeorge L. Rev. 689, 693 (2002). 6 527 F.3d 391 (Sth Cir. 2008). Other aspects of the case are discussed in Paul G. Cassell & Steven Joffee, The Crime Victims' Expanding Role in a System of Public Prosecutio
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017613 →Dep’t of State, 373 F.3d 152 (D.C. Cir, 2004) occceeesescsnsesssesnseeesesnseeecesnseeenesnseeeeesnseenesnseees Neumeier v. Kuehner, 286 N.E.2d 454 (N.Y. 1972) ccs Redding v. Edwards, 569 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2008) ........ Rivera v. Heyman, 157 F.3d 101 (2d Cir, 1998) eee Salahi v. Obama, 625 F.3d
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368 →8 (2010) eee *vili Schneberger v. Wheeler, 859 F.2d 1477 (11th Cir. L988), sarcasm cena enemies Sickles v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 167 N.Y.S.2d 977 (N.Y. SUP CH 1987) ccnscencnmmennencnmennencmmennennmmaennencmen Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Co., 578 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. DOO) sesceveescecswrencernccccreee
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368 →ccsssetsceccsneecescsnsecesesnsecesesnseeesesnseeesnsnseersnanseersnsnseerensess United States v. El-Mezain, No. 09-1560, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24216 (Sth Cir. Dec. 7, 2011) eceesescseeseessneeeeesneeeeeenees United States v. Hamdan, 801 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (CMCR DOLL) ceecccreseccscsnescescseseeesnsnsceesnsnse
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023369 →Article: Criminal Enforcement Redundancy: Oversight of Decisions Not to Prosecute
arijuana dealers who comply with state law). For local examples, see Joseph Goldstein, Spare a Swipe? New York City Eases Rules for a Subway Request, N.Y. Times (Apr. 17, 2016), Atips://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/18/nyregion/spare-a-swipe-new-yvork-city-eases-rules-for-a- subway-request.himl (describing a
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016520 →en prosecutors and defense because prosecutor had not consulted with victim in violation of 1/8 U.S.C. § 3771). 8 See In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391, 395 (Sth Cir. 2008) (acknowledging lower court's interpretation of § 3771(a) before any prosecution is underway); Does v. United States, 817 F. Supp. 2d 1337, 1342
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016534 →Entities connected to both Sth Cir. and New York

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Colorado
LOCATION
Philadelphia
LOCATION
Michigan
LOCATION
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Louisiana
LOCATION
Salt Lake City
LOCATIONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Eric Holder
PERSON
South Carolina
LOCATION