Epstein Secrets

om) Jay M. Wolman ([email protected]) s/ Nicole Simmons 26 EFTA00791895

ore a seal is imposed."). At oral argument, neither the parties to the appeals nor the panel itself suggested the district court's opinion denying the Miami Herald's unseal motion misstated the right-to-access law. To the contrary the Opinion correctly summarized the law, and properly identified the leading case

reet, 14th Floor Iarford m CT 06103 /s/ Nicole Simmons Nicole Simmons 22 EFTA00074985 CaesR29411403

edaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any countervailing interests exist, and prote

of New York (via United States mail) s/ Nicole Simmons 43 EFTA00075525 Case 20-2413, Document 40. 08

F.2d 110, 116 (2d Cir. 1987) (recognizing "defendants' fair trial rights" as an "appropriate" basis for sealing material). Lest there be any doubt, the Miami Herald's response to Ms. Maxwell's emergency motion to stay settles the matter. In opposing Ms. Maxwell's request, the Herald said: "The documents at issue

d, Tonya (INTAKE) Shull, Darren (COMBAT) Sigman, Tania (Fel X) Sikkema-Leak, Jane (CC P) Silvestri, Gino (COMBAT) Silvey, Jennifer Riv Bch) Simmons. Heather (INTAKE) Skirts, Terri (CC M) Skodmin, Karen (INVEST) Slade, Tina (Felony) Slater, Andrew (Cty Ct) Small, Joseph (Juv Intake) Smi

arris, Wyetha Fel U) Harrison, Linda Juv K) Hartwell, Kristina DOVE-TO) Harvey, Lauren DOVE-TD) Harvey, Lynn DOVE-Fell Head, Amanda CC L) Heald, Patricia CC L) Hearsurn, Debra Fel W) Herbits, Linda JlmmyRyce) Herman, Ron So Cnty) Hernandez, Janine CC E) Herat, Dana Collier CC 8) Hi