Epstein Secrets

n response. 21. Mr. Edwards agreed and ultimately discussed the civil cases with Mr. David Boies, the name partner in the New York-based law firm of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. I was aware that Mr. Boies not only had a well-regarded large litigation firm, but also had a strong track record of providing legal services for le

To the best of my recollection, | did not inform Mr Boies of our intentions and, to my knowledge, neither he, nor his partner Ms, McCawley, nor atto Stan Pottinger, were informed in advance of the date or contents of the filing, uy 33. In the course of those public attacks, Mr. Dershowitz made a number of state

islaine Maxwell submits this reply in support of her Motion to suppress all evidence the government obtained from a grand jury subpoena it issued to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and to dismiss Counts Five and Six, which are the fruits of that unlawful subpoena. Introduction and Summary of the Argument If the government mea

d McCawlpa Pottinger, Brad Edwards, or Peter Skinner; and (2) did not interview anyone other than AUSA such as the other attendees of the meeting (Pottinger, Edwards, and Skinner), or any of the other AUSAs whom AUSA talked to about her contacts with attorneys. Most conspicuous, of course, is the gove

islaine Maxwell submits this reply in support of her Motion to suppress all evidence the government obtained from a grand jury subpoena it issued to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and to dismiss Counts Five and Six, which are the fruits of that unlawful subpoena. Introduction and Summary of the Argument If the government mea

wle , Stan Pottinger, Brad Edwards, or Peter Skinner; and (2) did not interview anyone other than AUSA such as the other attendees of the meeting (Pottinger, Edwards, and Skinner), or any of the other AUSAs whom AUSA talked to about her contacts with attorneys. Most conspicuous, of course, is the gove