Epstein Secrets

ted in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee' Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

ppeals by claimants of a privilege in 10 EFTA00209394 Case: 13-12923 Date ITIsicloDUtp/2014 Page: 11 of 23 some civil proceedings. See Castle. Sangamo Weston, Inc., 744 F.2d 1464, 1465- 66 (11th Cir. 1984) (exercising jurisdiction because the appellant "claims a privilege of non-disclosure relating to mat

ted in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee' Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

ppeals by claimants of a privilege in 10 EFTA00209435 Case: 13-12923 Date ITIsicloDUtp/2014 Page: 11 of 23 some civil proceedings. See Castle. Sangamo Weston, Inc., 744 F.2d 1464, 1465- 66 (11th Cir. 1984) (exercising jurisdiction because the appellant "claims a privilege of non-disclosure relating to mat

d in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

eals by claimants of a privilege in 10 EFTA00209641 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 04/18/2014 Page: 11 of 23 some civil proceedings. See Castle v. Sangamo Weston, Inc., 744 F.2d 1464, 1465- 66 (11th Cir. 1984) (exercising jurisdiction because the appellant "claims a privilege of non-disclosure relating to mat

ed in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee'. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

peals by claimants of a privilege in 10 EFTA00209750 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 04/18/2014 Page: 11 of 23 some civil proceedings. See Castle'. Sangamo Weston, Inc., 744 F.2d 1464, 1465- 66 (11th Cir. 1984) (exercising jurisdiction because the appellant "claims a privilege of non-disclosure relating to mat