Epstein Secrets

participants in the criminal justice process. As the Fifth Circuit explained in reversing a trial court which had al

8 See generally Beloof, Cassell & Twist, supra note 6, at 392-99 (reviewing caselaw on the victim's interest in venue decisions). 379-737 A.2d 55 (N.J. 1999), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 858 (2001). 380 Id. at 64-69. DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017681 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 47 of 78 2007 Utah L. Re

Lines did not find that a general statement of authority can never meet the APA’s requirements to specify the legal authority for the rule. Instead, the Fifth Circuit held that that portion of the APA is violated when an agency chooses to rely on additional statutory provisions in support of its rule for the first

h Cir. 1991); McClinton v. Alabama By- Prods. Corp., 743 F.2d 1483 (11th Cir. 1984); see also Henchy v. City of Absecon, 148 F. Supp. 2d 435, 439 (D. N.J. 2001); Kamens v. Summit Stainless, Inc., 586 F. Supp. 324, 328 (E.D. Pa. 1984) (FLSA). 147 (But see Wilkerson v. Siegfried Ins. Agency, Inc., 683 F.2

victims.” The victims sought appellate review in the Fifth Circuit.°’ There, the court concurred with the district c

heard at any hearing involving a plea. See id. § 24-4.1-302.5. 236 Mo. ANN. STAT. § 595.209(10) (West 2011). 237 OFFICE OF VICTIM-WITNESS ADvocacy, N.J. DEP’T of LAW & Pup. SAFETY, A CRIME VICTIM’S GUIDE TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM 4 (2d ed. 1997), see also N.J. Const. art. I, § 22. Compare 18 U.S.