Epstein Secrets

d actual 2 prior knowledge of the issues, of the at-issue statements that 3 were offered by the defendant. Again, the statements were made 4 to Crescenz. 5 And then the last case is a 1983 case, Tierney v. 6 Davidson. That involved civil rights violations and objective 7 reasonableness by the of

we argued it a couple weeks ago in the 16 context of another motion -- oh, I'm sorry, because, your 17 Honor, you requested that with respect to Diane Flores. So we 18 didn't reargue it today, it is fully briefed for you. 19 THE COURT: Okay. In other words, I've got everything 20 on that. 21 MS. Mc

d actual 2 prior knowledge of the issues, of the at-issue statements that 3 were offered by the defendant. Again, the statements were made 4 to Crescenz. 5 And then the last case is a 1983 case, Tierney v. 6 Davidson. That involved civil rights violations and objective 7 reasonableness by the of

forget, we argued it a couple weeks ago in the context of another motion -- oh, I'm sorry, because, your Honor, you requested that with respect to Diane Flores. So we didn't reargue it today, it is fully briefed for you. THE COURT: Okay. In other words, I've got everything on that. MS. McCAWLEY: You do,

efendant had actual prior knowledge of the issues, of the at-issue statements that were offered by the defendant. Again, the statements were mad to Crescenz. And then the last case is a 1983 case, Tierney v. Davidson. That involved civil rights violations and objective reasonableness by the officers who

I forget, we argued it a couple weeks ago in the context of another motion -- oh, I'm sorry, because, your Honor, you requested that with respect to Diane Flores. So we didn't reargue it today, it is fully briefed for you. THE COURT: Okay. In other words, I've got everything on that. MS. McCAWLEY: You do, yo