Epstein Secrets

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa, 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

age to a very rich man on Palm . arguing because didn't want JD#2 to do a massage. JD#2 dea nd =began ato go anyway so that she could make $200. JD#2 states that she knew she would have to take her top off and that Epstein would masturbate during the massage. states that JD#2 knew she would have

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

e e to a very rich man on Palm Beach. and began arguing because didn't want to do a massage. decided to go anyway so that she could make $200. JD#2 states that she knew she would have to take her top off and that Epstein would masturbate during the massage. states that knew she would have to s

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

very rich man on Palm Beach. and began arguing because didn't want JD#16 to do a massage. JD#16 decided to go anyway so that she could make $200. JD#2 states that she knew she would have to take her top off and that Epstein would masturbate during the massage. states that JD#16 knew she would have