Epstein Secrets

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa, 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

and there were 28 calls between and JD#3. Although was aboard the plane during several trips, there is no evidence that she ever had contact with JD#3 or arranged for JD#3 to engage in sexual activity with Epstein; thus, I have not charged her in connection with any of this activity. Rather than tr

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

EPSTEIN L. JANE DOE #7 Jane Doe # 7 attended High School. She was recruited by Jane Doe #3 to go to Epstein's house when she was 16 years' old. JD#3 also went to Epstein's house and performed sexual services starting when she was 15. JD#3 refused to speak to police and the FBI, telling them that

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

C. Jane Doe #3 Jane Doe #3 also attended High School with Jane Doe #1 and JD#1 recruited her to go to Epstein's home to perform a sexual massage. JD#3 was in her sophomore year of high school. JD#1 told JD#3 that she could make $200 for massaging Epstein. JD#1 drove JD#3 to Epstein's house and tol