Epstein Secrets

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

ds to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft ownec ndant JEGE, INC. #. On August 19, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN and traveled from Van Nuys, California to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. #. On August 19, 2004, Defendant caused on

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa, 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 33. On August 19, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN and traveled from Van Nuys, California to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant WOE, INC. 34. On August 19, 2004, Defendant caused on

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

alm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 33. On August 19, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN and traveled from Van Nuys, California to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 34. On August 19, 2004, Defendant caused o