Epstein Secrets

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

nt caused a telephone call to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #5. #. On or about January 1, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Anguilla, British West Indies to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned EFTA00229889 by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. #. On or abo

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa, 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

t caused a telephone call to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #5. 75. On or about January 1, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Anguilla, British West Indies to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 80. On or about January 6,

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

caused a telephone call to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #13. 75. On or about January 1, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Anguilla, British West Indies to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 80. On or about January 6,